|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2012/1/1 22:46 Updated: 2012/1/1 23:14 |
|
Terri Hall, founder of Texans United for Reform and Freedom, saw the freight train coming over seven years ago regarding the scam of toll roads and public private partnerships. PPP's represent nothing more than taxpayer welfare supporting TXDot and government officials, not to mention foreign entities (CINTRA.) Not too surprised about the "free" lanes either. www.texasTURF.org
|
|
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| johnlyng | Posted: 2012/1/2 1:25 Updated: 2012/1/2 1:29 |
Quite a regular (Verified User) ![]() ![]() Joined: 2011/1/1 From: Lewisville Posts: 43 |
Some questions:
• Did anyone from TxDOT give a reason for the sales prices to be so high? • Did Mary Horn disclose her ownership of the property while working on the I35 Coalition or on matters before the Commissioner’s Court? As an aside, I think that if you're going to call someone a crook you should put your name to it. I am not defending Mary Horn at all, it's just cheap in my opinion to flame people anonymously. |
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| PhyllisJ | Posted: 2012/1/3 17:14 Updated: 2012/1/3 17:14 |
Not too shy to talk (Verified User) ![]() ![]() Joined: 2012/1/3 From: Posts: 1 |
Would love to see those appraisals. I can pay an appraiser to determine the price to put on my property (and I have). It was vastly different from the value that would be placed on it by an appraiser working on behalf of a lender. TxDot needs to work with appraisers who understand the difference in the two, as well as acknowledge that the public is paying their bill. It would be interesting to see if the appraisals were done by those who get regular business from the county, or have been seeking to get such assignments.
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| Anonymous | Posted: 2012/1/3 21:30 Updated: 2012/1/3 22:11 |
|
It is evident that the writer does not know the difference is MASS APPRAISAL and Fair Market Value Appraisal. These appraisal processes are two different concepts and result in different values. The writer needs to be educated in these concepts before writing an article of this nature to truly inform the public. In the article, the writer is very misinformed and uneducated in the matter. The facts are the facts, however, not all the facts are presented and leads the writer and readers to a false ideology.
Mass Appraisal is a technique that is typically only used by assessors. "The process of valuing a universe of properties as of a given date using standard methodology, employing common data and allowing for statistical testing." The Dictionary of Real Estate Appraisal
Fair Market Value Appraisal can employ a number of different approaches and value techniques. Example "fee simple vs. lease fee" and the applicability of Income Approach, Sales Comparison Approach and Cost Approach. Each of these look at similar properties to the property being valued and not a "universe of properties" and in Mass Appraisal.
Mass Appraisal is typically lower than Fair Market Value. As a taxpayer, do you want to be assessed under Mass Appraisal or Fair Market Value? I will go with Mass Appraisal since the government get to much of our money anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Poster | Thread |
|---|---|
| JEhinger | Posted: 2012/1/4 17:54 Updated: 2012/1/4 17:54 |
Quite a regular (Verified User) ![]() ![]() Joined: 2010/9/3 From: Posts: 128 |
DCAD records actually show two parcels – Prop. ID 173071 which LTJ researched – as well as Prop. ID 62610 as the lake access portion. DCAD records show that both were conveyed to TxDOT by the trust. DCAD records for 173071 only go back to 1994. However, the records for 62610 go back to 1992. In 1992, 62610 – by itself – had an appraised value of $95K. It would be interesting to know what the appraised value of 173071 was in 1992 and 1993. If it was very high like 62610, I think the ends start to get a little closer if perhaps TxDOT is using a standard that is more focused on potential value to the owner rather than current market value.
This parcel is also unique among the neighboring lots because it has both lake access and interstate access. I can kinda see how it’s possible that TxDOT could be applying a different standard based on valuation for condemnation purposes that might give double credit for lake and interstate access and might also use comps based on similar attributes over adjacent comps. If DCAD is basically asking the question “What would the property sell for now in a market transaction between willing parties?” – and TxDOT is asking “What is the potential value that this property could be brought up to?” it kinda sorta starts to look like this could be the difference in outputs of a couple of somewhat klugey algorithms that made opposite mistakes. Keep us updated. |
|
|
| Other articles |
|---|
| 2013/5/21 18:44:24 - Lewisville City Council Notes - 5/20/2013 |
| 2013/5/20 22:37:59 - Please Help |
| 2013/5/20 20:44:02 - Learning From the Rise and Fall of Michelle Rhee |
| 2013/5/17 17:10:00 - Movie Review: "The Great Gatsby" 8/10 |
| 2013/5/16 19:10:00 - State Fire Marshal and ATF Rule Cause of West Fire as Undetermined |
| 2013/5/15 22:00:00 - Wednesday Night Update - Severe weather edition |
| 2013/5/14 18:00:00 - Read the Inspector General's Report on IRS Scrutiny of Certain Tax-Exempt Organizations |
| 2013/5/14 1:03:52 - What Rick Perry Can Learn From California |
| 2013/5/12 16:00:00 - Lewisville Memorial Day Observance Scheduled for May 27th - 8 a.m. |
| 2013/5/10 9:20:00 - Local Election Results - Lewisville City Council, LISD Board of Trustees - 5/11/2013 |









