As the number of cases of West Nile virus has continued to increase in North Texas, Denton County Judge Mary Horn has declared a health emergency Wednesday afternoon, making the option of aerial pesticide spraying available as a measure to control mosquitos that carry the disease. The declaration requests assistance from the state.
The Denton County Health Department is recommending aerial spraying, saying that ground spraying and the use of larvacide has not been successful in containing the outbreak. “We are very concerned at the number, rate, and severity of cases of West Nile Virus among Denton County residents”, stated Bing Burton, Ph.D., director of Denton County Health Department. Most of the Denton County cases of West Nile have been South of Lewisville Lake.
Precinct 3 Denton County Commissioner Bobbie Mitchell, whose precinct covers a large portion of Southern Denton County said this afternoon that the county health department staff would be meeting Thursday to discuss plans for spraying. Horn's order is effective for 7 days, after which time, the commissioners must approve any extension.
Mitchell says she is in favor of spraying, due to the success of the program in Dallas County. There have been 112 cases of West Nile reported in Denton County this year, with one of those resulting in a death. Of those cases, 27 have been reported in Lewisville.
Cities would be asked whether they want to opt-in for aerial spraying. The Lewisville City Council will take up the issue at next Monday night's special meeting. This meeting is open to the public and begins at 6 p.m. on Monday, August 27th. Mayor Dean Ueckert said that he is in favor of the aerial spraying. "I've talked to the health department and doctors, and they all say that this is not harmful to people. There is no record of anyone being treated for any illness related to spraying," said Ueckert. Ueckert also noted that aerial spraying is nothing new, and that it is done in the Northern states quite often. As Mayor, Ueckert has no vote on the issue, unless there is a tie, which is possible at Monday's meeting due to the planned absence of one of the members.
But Lewisville city staff and some council members are skeptical about the effectiveness of aerial spraying. City Manager Claude King said that they could best be described as "honest skeptics" when it comes to aerial spraying. "We'll see what kind of information the County can produce on the effectiveness," said King. King said that their overall concern was with how effective it might be in an urban area where there are a spaces for mosquitos to hide. "We don't want to give citizens a false sense of security or comfort by spraying," said King, who emphasized that their position is that the most effective protection against mosquitos is for people to take personal precautions, which they can do without government assistance.
Councilman Neil Ferguson said he is not convinced that aerial spraying would do much, other than make residents feel assured that someone is doing something. Ferguson is concerned about possible health effects of the pesticide itself on humans as well as wildlife. Ferguson says that citizens need to take some personal responsibility for taking precautions. Councilman T.J. Gilmore is also leaning against it, saying that he doubts it would be effective, though he has requested some data on Dallas County's before-and-after. Gilmore will not be at Monday night's special meeting due to a previous engagement. Councilman Leroy Vaughn said he was leaning in favor of spraying, but he had two questions: "Is it effective?" and "Is it safe?" "As long as the product is generally accepted as okay, then I would say go ahead and do it," said Vaughn.
Councilman Rudy Durham said that he supports the idea of using aerial spraying. "Anything we can do to protect citizens on health and safety issues, I'm going to be for that. I don't think there's any other option for us to do. Just like the localized truck spraying, I think the aerial spraying would do that much more," said Durham.
Lewisville had conducted ground spraying once, and is already set to do ground spraying again on Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday of this week, in most parts of the city North of Bellaire, and West of I-35E. Ground spraying will be conducted at night, starting at 10 p.m. King said that if the City Council chooses to go with Denton County's aerial spraying plan, then the city would likely step back from its efforts at ground spraying, but would continue with its current efforts of testing for mosquitos - a task currently being handled by Lewisville Animal Control
If the county does conduct aerial spraying, it would be approved and funded by the Texas Department of State Health Services, and would be performed by the state's contractor, according to Bob Martinez, Emergency Preparedness Coordinator for the Denton County Health department. "The contractor will determine what pesticide to use, but if it is the same contractor used in Dallas County, then it is likely to be Duet", said Martinez. Martinez said the pesticide is approved by the EPA as well as the Centers for Disease Control. The pesticide is mostly effective when it comes in direct contact with flying insects, but would have some effect with insects that are under brush, trees, or hiding in the grass, explained Martinez. The pesticide is said to quickly degrade in the environment, lasting only about 5 hours before breaking down into harmless components.
City officials will distribute free larvicide "dunk" tablets to residents on a limited basis on Aug. 23-24. Residents can visit Central Fire Station, 188 N. Valley Parkway, between 5 and 9 p.m. either day to receive two free tablets per household.
This is a developing story. We will update it as we receive more information.
Re: Denton County Recommends Aerial Spraying; Lewisville ...
Please Mr. Vaughn, reconsider your vote. The results of Dallas County spraying can't be determined for several days, if not weeks.
The spraying will have terrible consequences for benevolent insects, ladybugs, honey bees, and dragon flies. Taking recommended precautions, long sleeves, DEET use, and most of all, not going out at sunup or sundown is the best preventative action.
I walked a two mile course in Central Park today at noon, not one mosquito was seen.
Re: Denton County Recommends Aerial Spraying; Lewisville ...
I was wondering myself what the basis of "the success in Dallas County" might be. All the planes landed safely, and the next morning there were a lot of dead mosquitos. (success!) Whether it was effective against WNV is the actual measure and will take more time to determine. It'll take even more time to determine what the ecological impact was.
This late in the summer, my two cents is that it's a radical approach to a problem that's on the decline already.
Re: Denton County Recommends Aerial Spraying; Lewisville ...
I don't really know anything about the subject of aerial spraying for mosquitos, but a quick Google Scholar search shows that there's plenty of research, some of it fairly conflicting.
Generally speaking, it would appear as though spraying does work, if by "work" you mean 1) reduing the mosquito population and 2) reducing the risk of West Nile Virus. According to a study based on the 2005 spraying in Sacramento: Quote:
Results indicated that the odds of infection after spraying were ≈6× higher in the untreated area than in treated areas, and that the treatments successfully disrupted the WNV transmission cycle. Our results provide direct evidence that aerial mosquito adulticiding is effective in reducing human illness and potential death from WNV infection.
Additionally, according to another study, "Human-health risks from exposure to the insecticide were below thresholds set by the US Environmental Protection Agency," so I'm not as worried about the effects on human health.
So I can certainly see both sides of this, because it's really a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" situation. You're risking the lives of citizens if you don't spray, but you're potentially risking much more by spraying. I don't envy anyone who has to make that decision, to be honest. -BC
Poster
Thread
Anonymous
Posted: 2012/8/23 14:10 Updated: 2012/8/23 14:30
Re: Denton County Recommends Aerial Spraying; Lewisville ...
But, as James says, there are precautions that people can take as well. If you do aerial sprays, you can cause environmental damage that isn't easily corrected and the dominoes begin to fall. Fouled water hurts the fish. As James pointed out, beneficial insects are hurt and that can hurt crops. Birds and animals that eat insects can be harmed. Click, click, click...there go the dominoes! People need to take personal responsibility for themselves and wear long-sleeves, bug repellant, and stay inside during the hours most likely to have active mosquitoes. People also need to dump standing water where they can or put the donuts in it if it can't be dumped.
Re: Denton County Recommends Aerial Spraying; Lewisville ...
I put in 3 hours in my yard today (clearing out the summer vegetable garden, weedeating, etc.). I held off going out until 9:00 AM, not one mosquito sighted. I also noticed some hummingbirds I haven't seen before visiting our feeders. That is usually a sign of the beginning of their southern migration. Spraying can't be good for them.
I'm very confused by an article in today's Dallas Morning News, page 1A. Virus risk to linger , CDC official expects "many more cases" through September. This despite aerial spraying? My understanding of the article (possibly fuzzy) is, regardless of spraying we still must take all precautions, and there will STILL be new cases of West Nile Virus.
I know our elected officials have, as their primary responsibility, the safety of all of us, but leaping into this with only a few days consideration is precipitous.
Re: Denton County Recommends Aerial Spraying; Lewisville ...
Okay, so I have a question:
In her declaration, Judge Horn mentions the Texas Government Code, chapter 418.108. There's a lot of information here, but after skimming through various parts of the chapter (believe it or not I don't have that much time on my hands, it appears as though the county judge is sort of #1 here, which makes sense, but that the next level down is the mayor, not the governing board of each city (assuming the area is incorporated). Granted, I think the mayor can delegate these choices to the council (which is a good idea generally speaking) but I don't see where it goes straight to the council. I'm not really an expert on this, but if anyone has a bit of legal experience or knows the law, I'd love to know what I'm missing.
As a side note, I learned that the mayor has the power to order an evacuation of the city. Good to know. -BC
Re: Denton County Recommends Aerial Spraying; Lewisville ...
Wow Brendan, good work. We all probably should have been aware that during a declared "emergency" the city executive is granted many powers.
I know I'm swimming against the tide on this aerial spraying issue, but does anyone else get the feeling all this attention from the CDC is field research? Every article I've read seems to infer CDC is here to observe if aerial spraying is effective.
I sure haven't volunteered myself, my family, my pets, and the local ecosystem to be subjects in an experiment.
It looks like our council will approve the spraying, since Mr. Ferguson apparently has reconsidered his previously negative vote. I'll try to talk my wife into taking the dogs to the coast during the spraying. Can't do anything about the insects and hummingbirds though.