Recent News and Opinion
2014/8/31 - Sunday Evening Update - Labor Day Edition
2014/8/30 - Football Scores - Friday, August 29th 2014
2014/8/29 - Letters: Legal Defense Fund Established for Freed
2014/8/29 - Content Removed
2014/8/26 - Burger King Inversion Update
2014/8/25 - Officers Receive Life Saving Awards
2014/8/24 - Lewisville To Spray Again for Mosquitoes Monday and Tuesday Nights
2014/8/23 - Motorists Reminded to Be Careful as Kids Head Back-to-School
2014/8/20 - Neighborhood Gets Help from LISD and Police on Litter, Crime Problem
2014/8/20 - Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent
2014/8/17 - Sunday Evening Update - End of Summer Vacation Edition
2014/8/17 - Pictures of Local High Water
2014/8/17 - Lewisville to Spray for Mosquitoes Monday and Tuesday
2014/8/16 - Flower Mound Presbyterian Church Celebrates 160 Years with Homecoming
2014/8/8 - Former Fire Official Arrested in Fill-the-boot Theft
2014/8/6 - Lewisville Lake and Drought Update
2014/8/5 - Saturday, August 9th: Lewisville Police Day - PD Hosts Anniversar...
2014/8/5 - Kidnapping Suspects Arrested; Police Dog Finds Fugitive
2014/8/2 - Movie review: "Boyhood"
2014/7/22 - Lewisville Loses Appeal on Sex Offender Ordinance
2014/7/20 - Monday Morning Update
2014/7/20 - Take the Win in Iran
2014/7/19 - Combating Post-Traumatic Stress Event in Denton Saturday
2014/7/14 - Lewisville City Council Adopts Vision 2025 Plan
2014/7/6 - Photos from Lake Park on Independence Day
Recent Reader Comments
2014/9/2 13:15 - Re: Burger King Inversion (dskinner)
2014/8/30 17:40 - Re: Parent Upset over School Fussing Over Student's ... (Anonymous)
2014/8/29 12:12 - Re: Burger King Inversion (jbcglc)
2014/8/28 22:32 - Re: Burger King Inversion (Anonymous)
2014/8/27 11:21 - Re: Burger King Inversion (dskinner)
2014/8/27 7:09 - Re: Burger King Inversion (Jonathan)
2014/8/26 16:00 - Re: Burger King Inversion (Anonymous)
2014/8/24 21:26 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (TexasMama)
2014/8/22 18:45 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (Anonymous)
2014/8/22 6:54 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (TexasMama)
2014/8/22 6:47 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (TexasMama)
2014/8/21 23:43 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (Anonymous)
2014/8/21 18:59 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (Anonymous)
2014/8/21 17:15 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (Anonymous)
2014/8/21 16:03 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (TexasMama)
2014/8/20 23:00 - Re: Lewisville Lake and Drought Update (Anonymous)
2014/8/20 14:17 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (Anonymous)
2014/8/20 14:08 - Re: Statement from City of Lewisville (Anonymous)
2014/8/20 11:34 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (jbcglc)
2014/8/20 9:23 - Statement from City of Lewisville (WhosPlayin)
2014/8/20 9:08 - Re: Letters: Freed Should Be Considered Innocent (WhosPlayin)
2014/8/15 11:43 - Re: Former Fire Official Arrested in Fill-the-boot Theft (Anonymous)
Re: Michael Burgess Misleads Constituents at Taxpayer Exp...

Poster: iSeeker  Posted: 2010/9/23 10:21:33

I like how you disparage what you deem "right-wing organizations" that Burgess quotes for his stats but then you hit people over the head with a blog put out by the White House Communications Director. Methinks the White House might have their own political agenda by saying that the republican plan would "double the national deficit in 10 years".

There was a good article in the Dallas Morning News yesterday (http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedconte ... ate.Edition1.4596ee6.html) that was put out by an AP writer. Here is what he had to say:

"Making all the tax cuts permanent would add about $3.9 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Obama's plan would cost a little more than $3 trillion over the next decade, about $700 billion less than the Republican plan."

So the truth is, the republican view and the democratic view are really not all that different since both sides want to keep most of the tax cuts going.

Thus the real issue then is whether or not you believe that raising taxes in a down economy on those making more than $200k (if single) or $250k (if married) will help or hurt the economy. In a vacuum, the answer is easy: it will help because it will raise revenue and we need that since we are running such a huge deficit. Of course, we don't live in a vacuum. So, the real real question is: can the government do a better job using the taxes to stimulate the economy than leaving the money in the hands of the "high-wage earners"?

I really don't know that answer, but that is how I would frame it. I'm not necessarily against a progressive tax structure, which is what we have already, but intrinsicly I don't like percentage rate tax increases. Since we use %'s, individuals real tax bill already goes up in the good times, and goes down in the bad times. People, even those high wage earners, are making less now, than they did before. I would rather see government tighten its spending, yes, even provide less services, than keep the spending the same when revenues decline. Maybe they should even think about putting dollars away in the good so they have some money when things go bad. Isn't that what we all try to do?
Post Comment
Comment Rules*
Comments by registered users are always approved
Title*
Message Icon*
       
Message*
URL Email Images Inside images Smiley Flash Youtube Source code Quote

Bold Italic Underline Linethrough  Left Center Right  


Click the Preview to see the content in action.
Options*
 
 
 
Confirmation Code*

Click to refresh the image if it is not clear enough.


Input letters in the image
The code is case-insensitive
Maximum attempts you can try: 10
 

The Lewisville Texan Journal is a service of SagePost, Inc.
Login to Comment
User:
Pass:
Remember me
Lost your password?
Create New Account